Prince Andrew – forced to walk a lone road

A quick catch up on the ongoing Prince Andrew saga of will-he won’t-he be forced to move out of his palatial 37 room Royal Lodge which even his late mother thought he would have to exit. An updated biography of Robert Hardman claims King Charles has finally removed his £1 million annual allowance and ceased to fund his personal security staff.

 Andrew was born 19 February 1960 3.38pm London with a Pisces Sun opposition Pluto and a 4th house Scorpio Moon, so letting go is not his style. Pluto reigns supreme – for the time being. He also has a defiant Uranus on the focal point of a yod adding to his determination to walk his own road.

  But the astro-omens are not in his favour. His Solar Arc Uranus is now approaching a conjunction to his IC hinting at a major domestic upheaval ahead. His Solar Arc Pluto is conjunct his 4th house Neptune for a sense of devastation and confusion around home and family matters. Tr Saturn now moving through his 8th house suggests he is being thrown back on his own resources financially and having to cope independently. And his progressed Mars is now exactly conjunct his 8th house Mercury on one leg of his yod.

 He does not look popular with any of the senior Royals and tr Uranus opposition his Scorpio Moon has two more exact hits – one exactly through this month and another next April.

  His relationship chart with Charles is in a state of upheaval exactly now as well with tr Uranus square the composite Pluto.

  All in all, the winds of change are not blowing the way he’d like.

  See previous post: Prince Andrew – a cold cup of reality. 1st June 2024

11 thoughts on “Prince Andrew – forced to walk a lone road”

  2. Amazing, this guy had every thing in the world anyone could want: food, housing, education, love, family, etc. But he has no ability to really have a career and a successful life. Reminds me of Princess Margaret. Too much, too little brain power ?

    • I agree. But, we all have to remember that he has been stopped from doing the work he used to do for the monarchy. So, essentially they create that limbo in which the person is forced to become a parasite. My take on this is that king Charles is not going to give him funds anymore because he has inherited enough from his mother to pay his own.

    • @Marilym
      Wasn’t Andrew the Queen’s favorite and he could do no wrong in her eyes.

      Well now he is suffering for being spoiled.

    • I’ve often debated with friends whether having some hardship in life is necessary for a human being to find purpose and cultivate talents. Too much hardship (esp financial) requires the most extraordinary talent (and a zeitgeist that values it) to allow for survival solely on that talent. Wouldn’t it be nice if human beings could be freed of spending most of their life on meeting their most basic needs.
      Yet, it also appears that too little hardship requires an innate drive to attain beyond what one can have without effort.
      Still, even without talent, many can find meaning by contributing to the community (the way so many retired elderly do) – something the royal family in particular should be best positioned to do. The problem is that, as royals, they can’t be expected or allowed to perform simple chores considered too ‘lowly’ for their rank. Andrew’s character, by many reports, is to require subservience from others – whereas, as a Piscean, he might be able to find purpose by giving himself to a higher cause (as when he was in the Navy)

      • Thanks Marjorie. I agree…It works very well!

        This is the first time I reply to a post. However, I’ve been reading your site for over 10 years

    • Yes, I care. Living in the US and seeing the former President trying to be an Absolute King in all but name, has made me really appreciate Britain’s constitutional monarchy and its place in the government system.
      Definitely not for everybody, definitely not perfect, and we could do without the parasites like Andrew, but I care.

Leave a Comment