The Inauguration chart (and therefore First Term chart) for whoever gets into the White House, assuming 12 noon or thereabouts, looks less aggressive than either GW Bush’s first term or indeed Richard Nixon’s. There is a risk-taking Uranus opposition Jupiter squaring onto a 9th house Pluto – so it will be control freaky where international affairs are concerned, arousing hostility. That emphasised Pluto could also point to bitter legal battles. There is a military Saturn square Mars, but it is not particularly highlighted. Saturn in the 8th suggests economic woes which would match the US Federal Reserve Bank chart which is showing major strain in late 2017 and through 2018. The Aquarius Sun is not well integrated into the chart being only widely square a Scorpio Moon and inconjunct the North Node – so maybe a characterless term, perhaps bedevilled by toxic clashes of opinion (gridlocked by Congress maybe or by legal actions?)
Hillary looks in good spirits from Dec 2nd till early January with tr Pluto sextile her Sun/Jupiter midpoint and her Venus (returning at points throughout 2017), though also surrounded by a fair amount of chaos. If she does get in, she’ll be straight into a violent series of situations from March onwards, on and off till late 2018, with tr Pluto opposition her Mars/Uranus. Which does coincide with challenges on her relationship chart with ISIS. Though that can also mean operations but it will certainly be high stress.
If her birth time of 8 am is sound then she’s got tr Saturn moving through her 1st quadrant, heading into the lowest profile phase, which generally means a less successful time for leaders, so if she is in, it may not be a memorable term of great achievements (viz David Cameron who had the same). And her Solar Arc Saturn will conjunct her Sun, exact late 2017 into 2018 which will be a real downer. On this birth time tr Pluto will move early in 2017 into her 3rd for a hugely pressured everyday schedule; and tr Uranus into her 6th from mid 2017 which could be health issues.
Her astrocartography isn’t worth much without an accurate birth time. Her greatest problems come in the USA and Canada.
Donald Trump does have tr Uranus trine his Sun/Jupiter midpoint from late November to late January and then tr Pluto square his Jupiter right through January 2017 – so lots of good luck, success and confidence. His chutzpah won’t be dented even if he loses. Plus his Solar Arc Pluto will conjunct his 2nd house Jupiter, exact in 3 months’ time, which will give him a gigantic financial boost or involve him in a stratospheric scheme. Though there’s always a risk with Pluto Jupiter of getting over confident and pushing across the line and it backfiring as it did in his campaign.
Tr Saturn will be hauling him back down to earth, opposing his Uranus and Sun and conjunct his Moon from late November till mid January and again later in 2017 – maybe family problems as well as other things.
Right through 2017 he’s got the continuing run from this year of bad tempered, insecure and over-reactive transits to midpoints. And a volcanic eruption and shock when his Solar Arc Uranus is conjunct his Mars in 2018.
His astrocartography certainly indicates Russia as a positive zone for him with his Jupiter MC there. His Mars hot-spots would be Libya, Eastern Europe, China and Indonesia.
If the polls are right (and when have they been recently?) and Hillary gets in, she’ll be enjoying herself a good less than he is.
How boring when this best of best soap operas ends! Of all the bad tv series around I think some of the networks ratings wil drop like boulders!
Brilliant piece on inauguration and after Marjorie! Guess it”s still hard to see how the candidates will feel on the 8th? As many are already voting I’m wondering the exact time they actually announce the winner.Any idea Marjorie?
As this is a non-astrological politics question, perhaps I can answer.
The voters are not voting for a President, but for a slate of Electors who pledge to vote for a specific candidate in the Electoral College. The votes are counted by each individual state (and the District of Columbia). The votes are counted by each individual state (and the District of Columbia). With the exception of Maine and Nebraska, the Electoral votes of the entire state goes to whoever has got the most votes in that state. So the people who actually win the state elections are the Electors pledged to a specific candidate, not the candidate themselves.
The Electors then meet on different dates in their own state capitals any time in November or December and send a certificate casting their vote to the US Senate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States)#Meetings
The US Congress meets in joint session at about 1PM on January 6th and starts counting these certificates and then officially announces the results, even though almost everybody knows the results in November itself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States)#Joint_session_of_Congress_and_contingencies
But given the very broad timeframe, you can see why the Bush-Gore court case did not disrupt the system at all. The argument was essentially which slate of Electors for Florida was eligible to sign the certificate and cast their votes.
Therefore there is no single election result for the US presidency.
I stand corrected. Electors meet in their respective state capitals (electors for the District of Columbia meet within the District) on the Monday after the second Wednesday in December, at which time they cast their electoral votes on separate ballots for president and vice president.
Stratospheric scheme – like Trump TV?
I will be so glad to have this unreality television series ended.